Imagined Future Scenarios
Wildlife Conservation, Probable Futures, Long Term (5 - 10 years)
Scenario Generated from 'From anxiety to coping: Understanding psychological distance and coping skills for climate change and COVID-19 in 10–12-year-old children' - Plos.org
Future Arc and Implications
Grow Arc
Social Impact: Increased public confidence in conservation efforts fuels demand for more interventions.
Technological Impact: CRISPR becomes more efficient and widely applied, expanding to numerous endangered species.
Ecological Impact: Enhanced species thrive, potentially leading to imbalances in ecosystems needing active management.
Economic Impact: A booming conservation technology market attracts investment and generates revenue through ecotourism.
Political Impact: Governments invest heavily in CRISPR research and implementation for conservation, often focusing on flagship species.
Narrative: Conservation thrives through technological advancement, leading to population growth of targeted species and expansion of human activity in protected areas.
Collapse Arc
Social Impact: Uneven access to CRISPR interventions exacerbates inequalities, leading to social unrest over perceived favoritism.
Technological Impact: Unforeseen side effects of CRISPR (e.g., new diseases or genetic instability) trigger population crashes.
Ecological Impact: Ecosystems become more fragile due to reduced genetic diversity from over-reliance on a few CRISPR-enhanced lines.
Economic Impact: Loss of natural capital and ecosystem services due to ecological imbalances leads to economic instability.
Political Impact: Political instability arises from resource scarcity and the failure of CRISPR to solve underlying ecological problems.
Narrative: Initial success with CRISPR is followed by unintended consequences that generate cascading ecological and societal failures, leading to widespread collapse.
Discipline Arc
Social Impact: Strict regulations and monitoring of CRISPR applications lead to increased surveillance within conserved areas and potential human rights violations.
Technological Impact: Centralized control of CRISPR technology ensures standardized protocols and rigorous risk assessment, potentially stifling innovation.
Ecological Impact: Ecosystems are highly managed and monitored, maintaining stability at the expense of natural evolutionary processes.
Economic Impact: Government control limits private sector involvement, prioritizing conservation outcomes over economic profit.
Political Impact: International agreements create binding commitments for CRISPR-based conservation, enforced by a global regulatory body.
Narrative: A heavily-regulated global conservation regime emerges, utilizing CRISPR and surveillance technologies to maintain ecosystem stability through centralized control.
Transform Arc
Social Impact: Radical change in societal values views all life as intrinsically valuable, shifting focus from species preservation to holistic ecosystem health.
Technological Impact: CRISPR is combined with other technologies like synthetic biology and AI to create entirely new, resilient ecosystems.
Ecological Impact: Ecosystems are designed to be more resilient to climate change and human impact through novel biological engineering.
Economic Impact: A circular economy centered around ecological restoration and sustainable resource management replaces traditional models.
Political Impact: New forms of governance prioritizing ecological integrity and long-term sustainability emerge, moving beyond nation-state centric approaches.
Narrative: A profound societal transformation driven by a new ecological ethic results in radical technological innovations and governance structures that prioritize ecological well-being.